An update on the 2012 child maintenance scheme

Divorce|January 28th 2016

Yesterday the Department for Work and Pensions (‘DWP’) published statistics for the Child Maintenance Service (‘CMS’) 2012 scheme (i.e. the current scheme), for the period August 2013 (essentially when the scheme really started) to November 2015. Note that these are ‘experimental statistics’, i.e. statistics that are not finalised and are still undergoing evaluation – quite why we can’t wait until statistics are finalised these days, I don’t know.

As I have explained here previously, the 2012 scheme is the third child support maintenance scheme, following the 2003 scheme, which in turn followed the original 1993 scheme. The 2012 scheme differs from the earlier schemes in that its objective is to support families who are unable to make child maintenance arrangements themselves. In view of this, the DWP is at pains to point out that comparisons should not be made to the previous schemes.

I should point out one other significant way in which the 2012 scheme differs from its predecessors. Unlike the earlier schemes, users of the 2012 scheme are required to pay fees for applying to use the scheme, along with charges for collection and enforcement. This factor needs to be borne in mind when considering any statistics regarding the 2012 scheme.

So, what do the statistics say?

Well, I suppose the first point to make is that the statistics tell us that the number of cases managed by the CMS continues to increase following the introduction of application and collection charging in 2014. The total caseload was 66,500 when application fees were introduced on the 30th of June 2014, and have since risen to 187,200 as at November 2015 (although the figures actually peaked in September 2015, and have decreased since). This sounds like confirmation that people are not put off from using the CMS because they have to pay a fee, but of course the problem with trying to evaluate the figures is that, without being able to compare with the earlier schemes, we have nothing to measure the figures against. Accordingly, I’m going to do what I’ve been told not to, and look at the statistics for the two previous schemes. These show that the total live caseload for those schemes as at August 2013 was about 1,400,000. That figure, I would submit, puts the 2012 caseload figure into some perspective, and makes it seem somewhat less impressive than it may have seemed at first glance.

Before I leave the subject of fees, I should say for the sake of completeness that the statistics tell us that about 30 per cent of applicants are exempt from the payment of an application fee.

Moving on, the statistics also tell us that in the quarter to November 2015, 87 per cent of case groups were contributing towards their current liability, with 88 per cent of cash due being paid (a ‘case group’ is all the cases associated with one paying parent, so including different families of that parent). This sounds quite impressive, particularly the figure for the amount of cash due being paid, although it is slightly less impressive when one sees that the amount of outstanding maintenance arrears accrued under the 2012 scheme as at November 2015 was a worrying £43.5 million. The DWP point out that the arrears figure will grow as the caseload increases, and it is an awful lot less than the arrears under the old schemes (see below), but that still seems like a lot of money from which children are not benefiting.

Which brings me on to the last point that I want to mention from the statistics: the number of children benefiting from maintenance. The statistics tell us that: “the number of children benefiting from maintenance continues to increase and, in the quarter to November 2015, stood at 185,300”. The figure, however, is “calculated from cases in which a payment was received”, and therefore a significant number of those children are not receiving their full entitlement. In addition, of course, there is a large number of children who are receiving nothing at all.

Notwithstanding my comments above, the statistics do seem to indicate that the 2012 scheme is doing a reasonably good job, as far as it goes. The problem, as indicated by the caseload figure for the old schemes mentioned above, is that the 2012 scheme is only dealing with the tip of the child maintenance iceberg. The old schemes were notorious for their inefficiency (witness the £3.9 billion arrears they ran up), but is the new scheme actually doing any better? Cleverly, the Government have ensured that that question can never be answered, as new scheme cannot be compared to the old ones, as explained. In particular, the new system has been designed both to encourage people not to use the CMS and to discourage them from using it, and we will never know how much child maintenance is being paid in relation to those families who have not applied to the CMS, but who would have previously applied under the old schemes to the Child Support Agency.

You can find the statistical release here.

Share This Post...


  1. Michael pearson says:

    Absoulte joke it’s a total scam the lot ov it child maintainance service! My son needs for nothing so wot am I payin it for he’s 11 if he wants or needs anything he asks, n as for mam if he needs anything let me I will personally go to wot ever shop it is and buy rather than not noing where I am payin my money too etc etc ✊✊✊✊✊

  2. LW says:

    Still not received a penny of Maintenence for son who’s eleven now, even though my ex had been working in the district and paying tax ni surely something can be done.

  3. Jay says:

    Scam all of it so government can show a cash flow going through there accounts, ex: if I have regular money’s going through my bank my bank manager will offer me x amount in loans ect. Csa Cms never been about the children.
    Not to mention those who have different children by different fathers and claim all benifits they can plus multiple child maintenance without it affect there benifits.
    And then the insult ex: I live on my own earn 250 a wk I pay 30 a week maintenance ok fair enough. But if I have a new family same wage and two younger children living with as part of my family on same wage I pay 28 a week maintenance so my two younger children are worth a pound each. Disgrace my younger children get more if I move out and there mother puts her own claim in what a complete farce

  4. Andy says:

    This is a very open wound…
    I am paying maintenance for my children and I will say that the caring and supportive child maintenance booklet with all the attributes of comments such “payments are agreed between both of you”. So now you have read the booklet you now see how much of a weapon the mother has to drive paying fathers into the ground,CMS then hammer you when your ex other bleets to the CMS because he hasn’t paid on the due day and by 9.00 am…I need the money!!! She cries!!!.

    When the disagreement between both parties they must of spoken to a panel of females, then decided to stab fathers in the back…
    Yes NRP,s are left penny less…
    On top of all this the failings in the prior joke schemes and failings in the agency on the history on collection of fees etc and payments, so, as per usual all costs are pushed onto the farther and his bread line living standards..the best of it is no one gives a shit !!!in essence you have no life after divorce or Childaintenance payments.

    One point to mention is that if you go self employed you can save yourself money but then you have the freedom to spend what you want on the children not told by the joke agency what you have to pay…
    PWC usually buy a new car band now two holidays a year now your paying direct to her…nice..

  5. Andy says:

    Don’t forget the agency does not want to get involved but funny enough they want 16% gross of my salary and if not,collect at source…Typical.
    ..perhaps That idiot Ian Duncan Smith should live on my salary and see how he have to live..but yet again in his situation he can only look down and laugh at his input,quite frankly ain’t a toss..
    Apologise in my rant but it is just beyond belief…
    Here is one point..if your child reaches 16 now can leave home and classed as a adult I think you can’t even pay direct to your child you still have to pay to you springing ex..Just shows what a joke this country is..only the benefit scroungers are better off.

  6. Yvie says:

    Once again the ‘scandal’ of fathers who apparently avoid child maintenance payments was raised in Parliament, probably by an MP who has never bothered to look at the whole picture and who more than likely raised the issue in response to a compliant from a disgruntled constituent. Not a mention of the many fathers who are denied contact with their own children, or of those who do have contact with their children, yet those same children are subject to intense pressure to reject one parent by the other parent. This is of far more importance than the transfer of money from one parent to the other. The psychological and long term damage to children in this situation is child abuse. When is somebody going to speak up for these children?

  7. Making Sure a Partner Makes Payments Towards Child’s Upbringing – Pda Cases says:

    […] 2012 Child Maintenance Scheme, run by The Child Maintenance Service (CMS), is open to new applicants in England, Wales and […]

Leave a Reply


Newsletter Sign Up

For all the latest news from Stowe Family law
please sign up for instant access today.

Privacy Policy