Call us: Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm, Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm
Call local rate 0330 056 3171
Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm | Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm
Call local rate 0330 056 3171
Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm | Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm

Judge calls for divorce publicity decisions

The Court of Appeal should make a decision about the publicity that big money divorce cases receive, a senior judge has insisted.

Speaking at the High Court on Friday, Mr Justice Moor said that there should be a definitive ruling on whether or not the press should be allowed to report the details of such cases.

Several senior judges have taken different positions on this issue. Last year, Mr Justice Holman claimed that there was “a very, very high public interest” in the openness of the family courts. He cited the “very long tradition in this country of open justice” and added that while judges “sit in the name of the sovereign” they do so “on behalf of the public”. He asked how anyone could have confidence in the family justice system if they are excluded from it. The public “are entitled to see the judge at work”, he insisted.

By contrast, Mr Justice Mostyn called such cases “quintessentially private business”. While it is one thing for the media to report aspects of a case “in an abstract way”, he said, “laying bare the intimate details of the parties’ private lives is altogether another”.

Mr Justice Moor claimed that such a clarification was “overdue” and insisted that “this difference of opinion … needs to be dealt with”. His comments came during his analysis of a financial dispute in a private hearing, although he gave a journalist permission to report his remarks on the issue.

The blog team at Stowe is a group of writers based across our family law offices who share their advice on the wellbeing and emotional aspects of divorce or separation from personal experience. As well as pieces from our family law solicitors, guest contributors also regularly contribute to share their knowledge.

Contact us

As the UK's largest family law firm we understand that every case is personal.

Comment(1)

  1. Luke says:

    ===
    ‘ He asked how anyone could have confidence in the family justice system if they are excluded from it. The public “are entitled to see the judge at work”, he insisted. ‘
    ===
    .
    I think this is obviously true, and I don’t see how people’s wealth should make specific cases an exception to this – that would be manifestly unfair.

Leave a comment

Help & advice categories

Subscribe
?
Get
more
advice
Close

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up for advice on divorce and relationships from our lawyers, divorce coaches and relationship experts.

What type of information are you looking for?


Privacy Policy
Close
Close