Call us Our customer care line is now open for extended hours : Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm, Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm

Rise in number of unrepresented litigants a ‘travesty’

News | 26 Apr 2016 1

The sharp rise in the number of people who represent themselves in court is a “travesty”, a charity has claimed.

A newly published report from Transform Justice, an organisation which seeks to improve aspects of the justice system, included a poll of 143 members of the legal profession. A vast majority – 90 per cent – of participants believed there had been a noticeable increase in ‘litigants in person’ over the last two years.

The charity attributed this rise to the near-abolition of legal aid in 2013. In fact, a majority of family law cases now feature at least one litigant in person.

Transform Justice Director Penelope Gibbs said it was a “travesty” that people who were not wealthy were in danger of being denied justice in the courts. Without legal aid to help them pay for professional representation, such people are given “little information to prepare for court”. As a result, they are “thrust into an adversarial and complex process which even those who are represented find hard to follow”.

Gibbs, a former magistrate, said the government should either “offer everyone access to legal advice or … redesign the system so those without lawyers can more easily make their case”.

Senior barrister Mark Fenhalls QC called the legal aid cuts “counter-productive” and said that they have “made the court system less efficient and more expensive”. He likened a person representing themselves in court to “having an unqualified person performing surgery”.

The Transform Justice report is only the latest of many criticisms of the legal aid cuts. A large number of charities, politicians and members of the legal profession have spoken out against them. Last year, High Court Judge Mr Justice Mostyn decried the “savagery” of the cuts in a speech in Sydney, Australia.

The blog team at Stowe is a group of writers who share their advice on the wellbeing and emotional aspects of divorce or separation from personal experience. Guest contributors also regularly contribute to share their knowledge.

Get in touch

    Request Free Call Back

    We remain open for business during the COVID-19 outbreak. Submit your details below, and we’ll arrange a free, no-obligation call back at a time to suit you. To ensure we are the right fit, we need to make you aware that we cannot offer Legal aid.


    1. Andy says:

      No wonder people are taking the route of self representation..The course of starting divorce is not cheap and with costs in thousands with personal loss in assets for the sake of a “gold digger”partner. To top it all your legal representation who has supported you with poor advice and can get away with it by saying “Well,we did our best” .
      No wonder the people go to court as they don’t trust any of the legal system currently followed,they loose what ever they had, now self representation is on the increase they still loose but not paid for poor advice.
      Divorce on line,now pushing forward and self representation. Who will need a solicitor..dying breed…

    Leave a Reply


    Newsletter Sign Up

    For all the latest news from Stowe Family law
    please sign up for instant access today.

      Privacy Policy