Yes. In England and Wales, a business you or your spouse have an interest in is treated as a financial resource. That means it must be disclosed and taken into account when considering a fair settlement, alongside the family home, pensions, savings and other assets.
If you’ve spent years building a company, the thought of it being divided can feel deeply unsettling. It’s one of the most common concerns we hear from business owners, and the reality is often less alarming than people fear.
A persistent myth is that the courts simply leave a business out of the equation. But it’s equally untrue that your spouse will automatically walk away with half your company. What happens depends on the value of the business, the income it produces, and how that fits into the wider financial picture.
The court will also consider whether the business is matrimonial or non-matrimonial:
In practice, the line between the two often blurs. A company you owned before you married may take on a matrimonial character if it grew significantly during the relationship, or if your spouse was involved in some way. Getting clear on what you’re entitled to in a divorce settlement is a helpful starting point for making sense of your overall position.
Your business structure shapes who legally holds the assets, how income is taken, and how easily money can be released without harming the business. For that reason, it’s the first thing to establish before anything is valued or divided.
Here’s how the three most common structures are treated:
| Business structure | Who owns it? | What the court can reach |
| Sole trader | You are the business | Your income and assets, like premises or stock |
| Partnership | Shared, often via a deed | Your share only, not other partners’ rights |
| Limited company | A separate legal entity | Share transfers or offsetting, not company assets directly |
As a sole trader, you and the business are effectively one and the same. You own the assets personally, you’re personally liable for any debts, and you’re taxed on the profits each year.
Because there’s no separate legal entity, the focus tends to fall on the income the business generates and the value of any assets it holds, such as premises, equipment, or stock.
A partnership involves two or more people sharing ownership, profits, and responsibility. It might be informal, with no written agreement, or formalised through a partnership deed.
Valuing a partnership becomes more complex when people outside the marriage are involved, as their interests can’t simply be set aside. A Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) adds another layer, since the partners’ liability for debts is limited rather than unlimited.
A limited company is a separate legal entity, run by its directors on behalf of its shareholders. In many family businesses, the directors and shareholders are the same people, often a husband and wife, structured that way for tax efficiency.
This is where things can become more nuanced. Because directors decide when profits are paid out as dividends, the income an owner appears to take may not reflect what the company could actually pay. The court will often look at what profits could be drawn, not just what’s currently being taken.
Where unconnected third parties also hold shares, their position has to be respected too, which can limit how the company is dealt with in a settlement.
Where the value is in dispute, the court will usually direct that an expert, normally a suitably qualified accountant, be jointly instructed by both parties to assess what the business is worth and what income it can realistically provide.
This is often where the biggest disagreements arise, and understandably so. One spouse may feel the business is worth a fortune, whereas the other may insist it’s barely staying afloat. The truth usually sits somewhere in between, and reaching it requires careful and thorough independent analysis.
How a business is valued depends largely on what kind of business it is:
It’s worth being realistic about the limits of these valuations. Many are simple exercises rather than the rigorous due diligence you’d see in an actual sale. Where one party suspects the figures don’t tell the full story, a standard valuation may not dig deep enough.
Tax also plays a significant role. The potential Capital Gains Tax on a sale or transfer can materially affect the net value of each party’s interest, so it should never be an afterthought. There’s real nuance in how to value a business for divorce purposes, and understanding the mechanics can help you see what your interest is truly worth.
This is one reason why Stowe has an in-house team of forensic accountants, who scrutinise disclosure and investigate concerns about accuracy, particularly where business or offshore interests are involved.
If you need advice for dividing your business in a divorce, reach out to our team for more information.
Barbara Bitis, Senior Associate at our family law office in Bournemouth, says:
“Establishing the value of a business is an important part of the financial remedy process. However, the court will also consider the commercial realities of the business, including the extent to which its value is tied up in working capital or other business assets, its liquidity, and the potential tax consequences of extracting funds or disposing of assets.
“In more complex cases, expert evidence from a forensic accountant is often required to assist the court, not only with valuing the business but also with assessing the practical implications of any proposed settlement.
“Although the court will generally seek to avoid ordering the sale of a viable business where other options are available, it may do so where it is necessary to achieve a fair outcome. In practice, however, an outright sale is relatively uncommon, and the court will often consider whether the value of the business can instead be reflected through offsetting against other matrimonial assets or by structuring payments over time, thereby preserving the business while achieving a fair financial settlement.”
In most cases, the court leaves the business with the spouse who runs it and balances things out elsewhere, rather than forcing a sale. The courts are generally cautious about interfering with a working business, and a sale is rare unless there’s no fairer alternative.
Wherever possible, the aim is a clean financial break between the two parties. Since usually only one spouse is actively running the business, common approaches include:
The business owner keeps the company, while the other spouse receives a larger share of other assets, such as the family home or savings, to reflect the value they would have had a share of in the business. It’s worth understanding the risk balance at play here.
A thriving business is rarely as secure as cash or property, and case law, including the Wells principle, recognises that business equity is inherently more speculative. To keep things fair, the courts may factor that mismatch into how the safer assets are shared, so one spouse isn’t left carrying all the uncertainty.
In some cases, shares may be transferred from one spouse to another, though this can carry tax consequences and isn’t always the cleanest outcome.
Where capital is tied up in the business, the income it produces may be reflected through spousal or child maintenance instead.
Less common, but it is possible. Routing a company’s entire income through one person after divorce can reduce the overall net income available through the loss of a second set of personal allowances and tax bands. Two households may end up running on less combined income than before. A sound settlement takes this into account rather than focusing on headline value alone.
It’s also worth remembering that going to court isn’t the only route. Mediation, arbitration, and other forms of non-court dispute resolution are often better suited to business owners. This is because they offer more privacy and avoid the delay and uncertainty that can unsettle a trading company.
No business is automatically ring-fenced from divorce, but sensible planning, ideally before any difficulty arises, can reduce risk and help preserve what you’ve built.
If your livelihood and the security of your employees depend on your company, wanting to protect it is entirely natural. The most effective protections include:
Whilst not legally binding in the UK, these can record the value of a business at the start of a marriage and set out how it should be treated on separation. They’re especially valuable for long-standing or generational family businesses, and far easier to agree on while the relationship is healthy.
Clear agreements can govern what happens to shares or a partnership interest, offering a measure of stability if a divorce occurs.
Well-kept accounts that separate personal and business finances make it easier to demonstrate the true position and avoid disputes over hidden value.
The sooner you understand your position, the more options you have, particularly around tax planning and structuring a settlement.
If you’re worried your spouse might try to devalue or move business assets, the court can grant a freezing order to prevent that. Acting quickly matters here, as prevention is far better than trying to recover value after the fact.
There are several practical ways to protect your assets on divorce, and weighing them up early gives you the best chance of preserving your business. If you’re facing divorce as a business owner, you don’t have to work it out alone. Our specialist team, supported by in-house forensic accountants, can help you understand your position and protect what matters most.
Request a free callback today to talk it through with someone who can help you move forward with clarity.
Sign up for advice on divorce and relationships from our lawyers, divorce coaches and relationship experts.
Privacy Policy Close newsletter modal