The Experts: Why aren’t solicitors moving up the judicial ladder?

Family Law | 7 Jul 2011 3

Recent Posts

What is a consent order?

September 22, 2020

 

This is a slightly expanded version of my latest post for The Times, which appears on The Experts blog today.

The Times reports that radical reform of the selection of judges is needed to break the stranglehold of white Oxbridge males at the top of the judiciary. The report notes that in the past ten years, not a single solicitor has been appointed directly to the High Court.

Solicitors make up 90 per cent of the legal profession, so why do so few of them move up the judicial ladder? Lord Judge, the Lord Chief Justice, has expressed his concern that “too few” solicitors apply to be judges. He has suggested that this is due, in part, to bright solicitors being unable to get time off to sit as part-time judges.

As a practising solicitor, I can think of another reason. Upon entering our profession, solicitors know that if they have any judicial ambitions at all, they should be temperate. Our aspirations must be confined to tribunals, chambers hearings and magistrates’ courts.

Only a few solicitors will ever be appointed to sit part-time in the Crown Court or county court as Recorders. Those who burst from our ranks and make it to the High Court, having served many years on the circuit bench, can be counted on the fingers of one hand. I note that these rare examples are all men who, with one exception, have come from London firms – so as honorary members of the “narrow elite pool” described in The Times, they fit the mould.

When I decided to become a solicitor, I did so not because I believed my chosen profession to be an intellectually inferior choice. Instead, it enabled me to have the client contact upon which I thrived. When I co-founded my practice in Leeds, I believed that I had been given an opportunity to develop a business while at the same time helping less advantaged members of society. I knew that opportunities to join the bench would be extremely limited.

Of my close contemporaries who chose the Bar, some are now Queens Counsel and hold judicial office. Meanwhile, my chosen path has brought its own rewards: I am privileged to head a practice that has grown from humble beginnings to become the country’s largest specialist family law firm.

While I have held judicial appointment in the past, I was relieved to resign. I was the chair of a tribunal and I found it to be mind-numbingly dull work, given that I had no power to do anything other than to apply regulations that were set out in a book in front of me. The justice of the case on the facts was irrelevant. It was not for me – but then again, it is for others.

I can’t help noticing that the criticisms about judicial appointments span the decades and are always the same, lamenting the high numbers of male, white barristers. Nothing changes. But perhaps the focus should turn to solicitors’ ambitions, needs and wants, rather than their timetables.

The founder of Stowe Family Law, Marilyn Stowe is one of Britain’s best known divorce lawyers. She retired from Stowe Family Law in 2017.

Share This Post...

Get in touch

Comments(3)

  1. Mike says:

    This is a very interesting post. I heard that there was an increase in those taking a Graduate Diploma in Law this year? We should hope to see an increase the number of solicitors coming through?

  2. Marilyn Stowe says:

    Thanks Mike. Funnily enough today my son Ben passed his LPC at Kaplan Law School in London so hopefully in the near future there should be at least one more solicitor!
    (However the great news was texted by Ben around the family at 5am !!!! this morning ……)
    Marilyn

  3. Tulsa Divorce Attorneys says:

    Marilyn I agree with you, if face to face interaction with clients is what you love doing, then accepting a judgeship is a bad choice.

Leave a Reply

Close

Newsletter Sign Up

For all the latest news from Stowe Family law
please sign up for instant access today.



Privacy Policy