Husband wins appeal in committal proceedings

Divorce|News | 7 Dec 2012 0

A husband who refused to comply with a court ordering him to pay his former wife £10,000 has won an appeal against imprisonment.

In the recently published case of Zuk v Zuk, the man had been ordered to pay the lump sum in financial remedy proceedings after the judge heard evidence that he had access to £37,000. A penal notice was attached to the order as the husband had made it clear that he did not intend to pay.

At a subsequent committal hearing, the man was sentenced to nine months imprisonment. He applied to have a finding of contempt of court set aside but this was refused. The husband successfully appealed.

Lord Justices Thorpe and Patten, along with Mr Justice David Richards, found that the Family Procedure Rules 2010 imposed a maximum sentence of six weeks for county court maintenance orders. The original judge had been wrong in believing she had jurisdiction to impose a sentence of nine months under the Contempt of Court Act 1981, they said.

The blog team at Stowe is a group of writers who share their advice on the wellbeing and emotional aspects of divorce or separation from personal experience. Guest contributors also regularly contribute to share their knowledge.

Share This Post...

Get in touch
Request Free Call Back

We remain open for business during the COVID-19 outbreak. Submit your details below, and we’ll arrange a free, no-obligation call back at a time to suit you. To ensure we are the right fit, we need to make you aware that we cannot offer Legal aid.

Leave a Reply


Newsletter Sign Up

For all the latest news from Stowe Family law
please sign up for instant access today.

Privacy Policy