UK civil partnership distinction ‘violates human dignity’, says Canadian court

Divorce|Family Law|News|January 10th 2013

A same sex couple who entered a civil partnership in London should be treated as married, a Canadian court has ruled.

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice said failure to recognise 44 year-old Wayne Hincks as fully married to partner Gerardo Gallardo would be “impermissible discrimination”.

The distinction in UK law between civil partnerships and marriage “violates human dignity”, the court added.

According to a report in the Telegraph, this is the first time a UK civil partnership has been recognised as a marriage in another country.

Mr Hincks holds both British and Canadian nationality, while Mr Gallardo holds dual Canadian and Mexican citizenship.

The pair entered into a civil partnership at Hackney Town Hall in 2009, but the relationship broke down after a later move to Canada. Mr Hincks sought a divorce but Mr Gallardo refused, claiming that they were not legally married in Canada, throwing his former’ partner’s right to a share in the couple’s assets into doubt.

Mr Hincks took his former partner to court, and after two years of dispute, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Mesbur has now ruled that the couple are legally married.

“It seems to me that to do anything other than recognise this particular civil partnership as a marriage would run contrary to the express values of Canadian society … and would constitute impermissible discrimination.”

Photo by Fin Fahey via Wikipedia under a Creative Commons licence




Share This Post...

Leave a Reply


Newsletter Sign Up

For all the latest news from Stowe Family law
please sign up for instant access today.

Privacy Policy