Call us Our customer care line is now open for extended hours : Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm, Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm

US court condemns ‘repugnant’ child support deal

Children|Divorce|News | 26 Jun 2013 0

Parents living in Indiana cannot forego time with their children in order to pay less child support, the state’s Supreme Court has ruled.

In a unanimous ruling, the court justices condemned a 2006 divorce agreement in which a father man had agreed to forego all time with his children in exchange for paying no child support.

Justice Steven David declared:

“The concept of parents negotiating away parenting time as a means to eliminate the obligation to pay child support is repugnant and contrary to public policy.”

The judge, a former army officer, added:

“It is incomprehensible to this Court to imagine that either parent would ever stipulate to give up parenting time in lieu of not paying child support. Every child deserves better than to be treated as nothing more than a bargaining chip.”

According a report on RTV6, the father in the 2006 later changed his mind and offered to pay backdated support in exchange for time with his daughter, but the mother objected and his request was thrown out by a lower court.

The blog team at Stowe is a group of writers based across our family law offices who share their advice on the wellbeing and emotional aspects of divorce or separation from personal experience. Guest contributors also regularly contribute to share their knowledge.

Get in touch

    Request Free Call Back

    We remain open for business during the COVID-19 outbreak. Submit your details below, and we’ll arrange a free, no-obligation call back at a time to suit you. To ensure we are the right fit, we need to make you aware that we cannot offer Legal aid.

    Leave a Reply


    Newsletter Sign Up

    For all the latest news from Stowe Family law
    please sign up for instant access today.

      Privacy Policy