In a recently published case, the High Court rejected an adoption application because the man had not spent enough time with the child.
The case of Re X concerned a British citizen who has spent a number of years working in the Middle and Far East. However, he still owned properties in this country and planned to retire here. His ‘domicile’ (residence for legal purposes) therefore remained the UK.
“An adoption order may be made on the application of one person who has attained the age of 21 years if the court is satisfied that the person is the partner of a parent of the person to be adopted.”
However, the judge noted, the child had not lived with the prospective father for a period of at least six months prior to the application, as required by section 42 (3) of the order. This reads:
“If the applicant or one of the applicants is the partner of a parent of the child, the condition is that the child must have had his home with the applicant or, as the case may be, applicants at all times during the period of six months preceding the application.”
The girl’s mother had moved to live with the man in the country where he worked, and she attended boarding school. The man was in regular contact with the girl and had taken on financial responsibility for her, but had only spent around a week with her in the six months before the application, and that did not meet the requirements of the Act, the judge ruled.
However, she admitted to “conflicting emotions” about not granting the order. The judge noted that:
“I have no reason to doubt that it would be in the best interests of X to be adopted by the applicant.”
But these concerns could not justify failure to meet the “gateway” requirements of section 42 (3).
Photo by Oxfordian via Flickr under a Creative Commons licence