High Court throws out immunity claim in case involving the late king of Saudi Arabia

Divorce|June 9th 2014

The High Court has thrown out a claim of ‘state immunity’ in a financial wrangle involving a Palestinian woman who was married to the late king of Saudi Arabia.

Janan Harb says she secretly wed Fahd bin Abdulaziz Al Saud in 1968 at the age of 19, when the then prince worked as an interior minister in the Middle Eastern state. But she was later forced to leave the country, the Telegraph reports.

She is Palestinian by birth but now holds British citizenship.

Fahd ascended to the throne in 1982 after the death of his brother Khalid and reigned until his own death in 2005. The monarch had promised to provide for her financially, Mrs Harb insisted. Prince Abdul Aziz, son of King Fahd, later offered her £12 million, plus two high value flats in Chelsea, the court heard.

She has now launched proceedings in the High Court, claiming that she has received neither the money nor the property.

Prince Abdul Aziz had argued that the English courts had no jurisdiction in the case, on the grounds of “state immunity”.

But Mrs Justice Rose  said he had received no response from the Prince to Mrs Harb’s claims, simply his objection the court’s jurisdiction. In addition state immunity no longer applied in the case, since King Fahd has passed away, the judge declared.

A full hearing in the dispute will now proceed

Mrs Farb said she was “happy and relieved” after the ruling and but said he would “accept the offer of the movie of the book I have written” if the Prince appealed.

Photo of Saudi capital Riyadh  by dr. zaro via Flickr under a Creative Commons licence

Author: Stowe Family Law

Comments(2)

  1. Andrew says:

    This is the same woman who thought the English courts could and would order the King of Saudi or his estate to pay her maintenance, isn’t it?

    If she wins the case I wish her joy of any attempt to enforce her judgment. I suppose if the flats are still in the possession of the estate she might get them – a Registrar could sign the transfer – but the money? I think not.

  2. Saudi property tycoon can’t sell £20m home during divorce - Marilyn Stowe Blog says:

    […] wife applied to the High Court for the injunctions to be […]

Leave a Reply

Close

Newsletter Sign Up

For all the latest news from Stowe Family law
please sign up for instant access today.

Privacy Policy