Call us: Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm, Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm
Call local rate 0330 056 3171
Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm | Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm
Call local rate 0330 056 3171
Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm | Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm

Care system veterans say no to open courts

Young people who have been through the care system do not want increased media access to family courts, a study suggests.

Legal charity the National Youth Advocacy Service and the Association of Lawyers for Children interviewed 11 people aged between 16 and 25 who had been through the care system. They were asked about plans to increase transparency in the family courts.

All 11 were opposed to greater media attendance at family court hearings.

Currently, approved journalists can attend some family hearings but there are stringent restrictions on what they can report. Under rules currently being considered by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division, however, restrictions on press reporting could be eased and members of the public could also be allowed to attend hearings.

The 11 respondents, however, believed that:

“…the family court is not a public arena and [the plan] represents a failure of parliament to consider and take seriously the views, needs and long-term welfare of the children concerned.”

Greater involvement by the media was not the right way to increase public knowledge of the family courts, the survey respondents claimed. Instead they proposed “an independent, accountable agency”.

The courts should be very careful to consider the views and long-term welfare of children involved in family law cases when media reporting was to be allowed, the respondents added. They stressed the importance of anonymity for such children, who already faced emotional challenges. Identification could lead to depression, self-harm, public humiliation and even suicide.

Photo by niclas via Flickr under a Creative Commons licence

The blog team at Stowe is a group of writers based across our family law offices who share their advice on the wellbeing and emotional aspects of divorce or separation from personal experience. As well as pieces from our family law solicitors, guest contributors also regularly contribute to share their knowledge.

Contact us

As the UK's largest family law firm we understand that every case is personal.


  1. Anon says:

    LOL. A group study of 11 people is somehow represents the whole as an entirety! Next they will poll 30 people in the greater UK area to determine what everyone needs.

  2. Kathleen Danby says:

    Exactly what I was thinking – no doubt the eleven “children” were those who have been brainwashed by social services, or else they are social workers posing as children. It is not in the interests of social workers to bring the workings of the courts into the light of day, as their dirty little secret deals with police, solicitors, barristers and judges would be exposed, and the court would be revealed as the sham it is.

    Bring EVERYTHING which goes on in the Family Courts into the harsh glare of the spotlight. Only then will the truth be revealed.

Leave a comment

Help & advice categories


Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up for advice on divorce and relationships from our lawyers, divorce coaches and relationship experts.

What type of information are you looking for?

Privacy Policy