Call us Our customer care line is now open for extended hours : Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm, Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm

Care system veterans say no to open courts

Family Law | 31 Jul 2014 2

Young people who have been through the care system do not want increased media access to family courts, a study suggests.

Legal charity the National Youth Advocacy Service and the Association of Lawyers for Children interviewed 11 people aged between 16 and 25 who had been through the care system. They were asked about plans to increase transparency in the family courts.

All 11 were opposed to greater media attendance at family court hearings.

Currently, approved journalists can attend some family hearings but there are stringent restrictions on what they can report. Under rules currently being considered by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division, however, restrictions on press reporting could be eased and members of the public could also be allowed to attend hearings.

The 11 respondents, however, believed that:

“…the family court is not a public arena and [the plan] represents a failure of parliament to consider and take seriously the views, needs and long-term welfare of the children concerned.”

Greater involvement by the media was not the right way to increase public knowledge of the family courts, the survey respondents claimed. Instead they proposed “an independent, accountable agency”.

The courts should be very careful to consider the views and long-term welfare of children involved in family law cases when media reporting was to be allowed, the respondents added. They stressed the importance of anonymity for such children, who already faced emotional challenges. Identification could lead to depression, self-harm, public humiliation and even suicide.

Read the report here.

Photo by niclas via Flickr under a Creative Commons licence

The blog team at Stowe is a group of writers who share their advice on the wellbeing and emotional aspects of divorce or separation from personal experience. Guest contributors also regularly contribute to share their knowledge.

Get in touch

    Request Free Call Back

    We remain open for business during the COVID-19 outbreak. Submit your details below, and we’ll arrange a free, no-obligation call back at a time to suit you. To ensure we are the right fit, we need to make you aware that we cannot offer Legal aid.


    1. Anon says:

      LOL. A group study of 11 people is somehow represents the whole as an entirety! Next they will poll 30 people in the greater UK area to determine what everyone needs.

    2. Kathleen Danby says:

      Exactly what I was thinking – no doubt the eleven “children” were those who have been brainwashed by social services, or else they are social workers posing as children. It is not in the interests of social workers to bring the workings of the courts into the light of day, as their dirty little secret deals with police, solicitors, barristers and judges would be exposed, and the court would be revealed as the sham it is.

      Bring EVERYTHING which goes on in the Family Courts into the harsh glare of the spotlight. Only then will the truth be revealed.

    Leave a Reply


    Newsletter Sign Up

    For all the latest news from Stowe Family law
    please sign up for instant access today.

      Privacy Policy