Special guardianship orders have doubled

Children|October 5th 2015

The number of children subject to special guardianship orders is continuing to rise.

New statistics published by the Department for Education reveal that a total of 3,520 children left the care system to live with family friends or relatives after being made the subject of a special guardianship order in the year to March. This is an increase of close to five per cent over the previous year, when 3,360 were placed in special guardianship arrangements.

A few years earlier, in 2010-11, just 1,780 children were subject to special guardianship orders: the current figure represents an increase of 97.8 per cent.

Last month, Children’s Minister Edward Timpson promised a review of special guardianship orders, amid concerns that they were in danger of overuse and claims that such arrangements cannot match the stability and permanence of adoption.

Read the statistics in full here.

Photo by Stephan Hochhaus via Flickr under a Creative Commons licence

Share This Post...


  1. David Mortimer says:

    Hi Marilyn Stowe,

    The Tories arrogance will be their downfall.


    The change will be how we use the internet.


    Tories “not welcome” in Manchester – anti-austerity protesters who feel “alienated and worried” by govt policies


    Middle-class young ‘will fare worse than their parents’


    British workers suffering worst decline in real wages on record


    Austerity leads to more privatization & increased costs to tax payers for the same services. Osborne’s austerity policy between 2010 – 2015 didn’t balance the budget deficit but it did double the national debt. Money creation must be put back in public hands & the bankers who caused the crash must be held to account. See you in Manchester


    Vote no confidence in David Cameron


    Best regards Dave

  2. Julie higgins says:

    I think the special guardianship orders are out of order the social workers give them to anyone that sides with them even drug addict s if that say the right thinks and the court think it’s the best for the child well if it was their child would that think the Sam I think that should re think it order and make the social services do the best for the family and the child

Leave a Reply


Newsletter Sign Up

For all the latest news from Stowe Family law
please sign up for instant access today.

Privacy Policy