Call us Our customer care line is now open for extended hours : Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm, Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm

Supreme Court Justice considers prenups

Marriage|Relationships | 22 Mar 2017 2

Supreme Court Justice Lord Wilson of Culworth raised questions about the legal validity of prenuptial agreements at an event this week.

Speaking to law students at the University of Bristol, the 71 year-old Deputy President of the Supreme Court asked whether:

“We have now reached the stage in which, if acting with appropriate care and understanding, parties should be allowed to elect the sort of marriage which they want.”

Some held the view, he said, the spouses should not be allowed to make their own decisions in relation to the financial side of marriage, given the institution’s public status. In this view, prenuptial agreements represented a watered-down version of marriage he explained.

“One view is that in those circumstances parties should not be able to opt for marriage-lite, in which the law’s verdict about the extent of their obligations on divorce in the light of all the circumstances which have arisen is overridden by what they chose to agree perhaps many years earlier.”

But, he asked:

“I wonder… whether by modern standards that view is too patronising. Does it make our law inappropriately intrusive into personal, adult arrangements?”

Her referred to the precedent-setting case of Radmacher v Granatino in 2010, in which the Supreme Court ruled that prenuptial agreements should be binding as long as it had been freely entered into, except where:

“…in the circumstances prevailing it would not be fair to hold the parties to their agreement.”

But the nature of such circumstances “may need further attention” His Lordship claimed.

The family courts needed to consider, he continued, “how far individual couples should be free to re-write that essential feature of the marital relationship as they choose.”

Read Lord Wilson’s speech here.

The blog team at Stowe is a group of writers based across our family law offices who share their advice on the wellbeing and emotional aspects of divorce or separation from personal experience. Guest contributors also regularly contribute to share their knowledge.

Get in touch

    Request Free Call Back

    We remain open for business during the COVID-19 outbreak. Submit your details below, and we’ll arrange a free, no-obligation call back at a time to suit you. To ensure we are the right fit, we need to make you aware that we cannot offer Legal aid.


    1. Andrew says:

      Well, well. Is somebody finally listening?

    2. Andrew says:

      Now I come to think of it: the bit about “circumstances prevailing” reminds me of the screen villain who is reminded of the terms of a deal and says “That was then; this is now”.
      Perhaps the easiest way for the judiciary to get it right and save face would be to decide that where there was a prenup that is the most important of all the prevailing circumstances.

    Leave a Reply


    Newsletter Sign Up

    For all the latest news from Stowe Family law
    please sign up for instant access today.

      Privacy Policy