Male DV victim reaches settlement after his address revealed

Family|September 25th 2017

An ambassador for a male domestic violence charity has reached an out-of-court settlement with a council which published his address.

Ian McNicholl suffered violence a decade ago at the hands of a woman who subsequently received a seven year jail sentence for GBH.

Later he informed Hull City Council that he remained in fear for his safety and wanted his private details to be kept out of the public eye, as was his right under current legislation. But last year he discovered that his name and address had nevertheless been added to the public electoral register.

Ian complained to the Information Commissioner, saying he suspected Hull City Council hadn’t taken his request seriously because of his gender. The Commissioner did conclude that the council had been in breach of its statutory duties.

Mr McNicholl eventually launched civil proceedings and Hull City Council finally agreed to a settlement. But it would not accept liability for the publication, blaming the inclusion of his details on a software glitch.

Ian has been an active campaigner for the Mankind Initiative and male victims of domestic violence since 2010. He recalls:

“I was shocked and horrified when I found out that my name and address were on the electoral register when I had clearly expressed my right to remain anonymous because of my previous circumstances. The stance adopted by Hull City Council and their over reliance on their “software” sent a clear message to me that the Council was not taking their safeguarding duties surrounding domestic abuse seriously. The findings of the Information Commissioner endorsed my view.”

The Mankind ambassador added:

“I remain deeply concerned and fearful as to just how many more male victims have asked for anonymity but have resulted with their details being in the public domain. I would appeal to all councils in particular to review their electoral registration procedures as a matter of urgency.”

Author: Stowe Family Law

Comments(2)

  1. Dr Grumpy says:

    So 10 years after the event we get a high profile male DV victim only because a local council got its security protocols wrong! Can you imagine this state of affairs happening to a female victim? No it would make the national news! And did this story make it? Well it’s the first I’ve heard about it! Double standards or what?

  2. Andy says:

    Justice for the silent victims..you put your trust in the so called experts only to have that trust decimated and treated like scum by the experts…
    Who would you trust in such situations as this historical case..Just look at the example of one male DV case who could only video capture the abuse..Trouble is no one would believe him untill the video evidence was made available..If this was a Role reversal case how much shouting would the DV victim demand and use all deceitful and attempts to gain such laws to suite the situation…

    Fight and fight on for justice and so called experts who quite frankly are no experts at all…

Leave a Reply

Close

Newsletter Sign Up

For all the latest news from Stowe Family law
please sign up for instant access today.

Privacy Policy