Reports emerge that the estranged wife of Ant McPartlin plans to take him for every penny

Divorce|Marriage|Relationships|June 21st 2018

If the headlines are correct, the divorce battle between Ant McPartlin (H) and his estranged wife Lisa (W) is becoming more contentious by the minute.

Recent reports that he is dating his personal assistance has led to angry Twitter posts and ‘claims’ that W now has her sights set on taking him for every penny.

But can you actually take someone for every penny in a divorce? Guest blogger Phoebe Turner, Managing Partner at the Stowe Family Law London Victoria office joins us to discuss if this is ever the case.

“England is often regarded as the divorce capital of the world for the wealthy, in part due to the fact that in English law both partners are often entitled to share the capital that is built up in a marriage equally.

With this very high-profile case, the media attention is an issue especially with H’s well-documented difficulties with alcohol abuse.  So, a key priority for H will be to keep it out of the public eye and try to protect his valuable brand. I would expect his reputation management advisors to encourage him to get an injunction on the press having access to proceedings.

Alternatively, H and W may wish to utilise the increasingly popular method among high net worth parties, especially those in the public eye, of private arbitration /Financial Dispute Resolutions where the details of the final settlement are kept entirely confidential, essentially a secret divorce.

Many of the wealthiest cases are not held in open court and many deals amongst the wealthy elite remain secret. While we read about high-profile cases in the press, the biggest divorce settlements are not always those in the news, but those conducted under a shroud of secrecy.

The couple were married in 2006, but have been together for 18 years and these years may be added on to the length of the relationship. In any event, this is a long relationship where it would appear a significant proportion of the assets will have been accrued during the marriage.

As there are no children W can only claim for herself and the fact that H allegedly had an affair will not affect the financial outcome.  The starting point will be a 50:50 division of all assets in H and W’s name (this division can be a very complicated process in a high net worth divorce). Unless of course, they had a prenup which may or may not be upheld depending on the parties’ specific circumstances.

The quicker both parties reach a decision on the terms of the divorce and their finances the better as it will incur lower costs. Lengthy divorce battles in court are expensive.

So, can W take H for every penny? Actually no, but she may get half of every penny. I am interested to watch how this one plays out.”

Worried about divorce? Contact our team We’ll be with you every step of the way.

Author: Phoebe Turner

Phoebe Turner is the managing partner of our London Victoria office. She joined Stowe Family Law in December 2013.  Phoebe practices a broad range of private family matters, including divorce; complex financial disputes; and injunction proceedings. She frequently deals with complex, high net worth cases involving trusts, business and assets located outside the jurisdiction. Additionally, Phoebe advises on private disputes involving cases which often involve disagreements over contact, maintenance, residence relocation, and applications to remove children from the jurisdiction permanently. She also has a wealth of experience in advising on cohabitation and in drafting pre-nuptial agreements. Phoebe is a member of Resolution and the West London Law Society.

Comments(3)

  1. Andy says:

    Nothing new in this day and age.. Your solicitor will tell you that… From a man’s point of view.

  2. Dr. Manhattan. says:

    This should be a wake up call to anyone who thinks getting Married is a good idea in todays world. its all about the Money.

  3. JamesB says:

    I agree with both the above.

    Such an approach is destroying the institution of marriage although she wont care about that. The lawyers should and to be fair to them they do argue for change. But not to the ancillary relief which they need to to stop it becoming an outdated institution as I would like to see my children married, especially the girls, to protect them, but cant seriously advise it under the current hideous system.

    The law here needs to be changed to make it fairer, including allowing prenups. Its infamous now, even abroad they say “oh yes, I have heard of your bad divorce law! Your country needs to change it”.

    With regards to Ant’s money, I think it unlikely and unfair to argue for half of it. I can’t remember seeing her in the outback for I’m a celebrity get me out of here, or Saturday night takeaway, e-factor etc. Although I admit to watching v little. Very expensive companion that. Could he have got that for free these days without getting married? Probably. Mick Jagger hasn’t been married for years and does ok for example. Seems to be the way to do things that, not getting married. Hopefully they wont bring in common law marriage to stitch him and people up anyway.

    What would I give her if I were him? I don’t know how long they were married and isn’t applicable to most divorces. A few million I suppose.

Leave a Reply

Close

Newsletter Sign Up

For all the latest news from Stowe Family law
please sign up for instant access today.

Privacy Policy