Call us: Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm, Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm
Call local rate 0330 056 3171
Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm | Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm
Call local rate 0330 056 3171
Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm | Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm

Dishonesty in divorce: The six red flags of fraud and asset hiding

Fraud is relatively rare in divorce cases, but personal motives in divorce can lead to a party (for reason of wanting to keep their perceived “fair” share) overstating (or understating) asset values and incomes, or even omitting them altogether, to retain/ obtain a greater share of the marital pot.

It is usually the case that one spouse has a much greater knowledge and understanding of the assets, their values, incomes and overall financial wealth of the marriage.  That knowledge is regularly used, in conjunction with representations of “I am being fair” and similar terms to encourage the other spouse to enter into an early settlement, sometimes without legal representation to assist.

To be sure of obtaining a fair settlement, all assets and incomes must be identified and valued. If an asset is not included (through reason of being missed out accidentally or hidden/ misrepresented deliberately) in divorce negotiations it cannot be split, and that will lead to an unfair settlement.

Perhaps your spouse is refusing to provide explanations or hand over documentation/ statements or there is a lot of information absent when you receive the papers. Maybe the figures are just not stacking up and there is no way their current lifestyle could be afforded based on declared incomes and known assets.

With their combined 50 years of experience, our in-house Forensic Accounting team, Nick & Suzanne, have seen every trick in the book.  Their experience in reading between the lines of personal and business financial disclosure coupled with their accountancy background means they are uniquely able to assess whether the financial disclosure is full, frank and clear, or not.

Today they share some of their “red flags” to indicate whether your spouse may be being less than honest with their disclosure.

What are the six red flags of fraud and asset hiding?

1  Changes to online accounts and passwords

Passwords are suddenly changed on shared email and joint bank accounts for no real reason. You are not allowed the new details so you have no access to the information.

2  Transfers of property or shares to children/ family members

A decision to transfer property to your children or family members should serve as a warning if there is no genuine reason why.  Assets you thought you owned as a couple are suddenly held by family members.

3  Unusual cash withdrawals and spending behaviours

You notice an unusual pattern of large sums of cash being withdrawn and a big change in spending behaviours.  Perhaps there is a flurry of high-value gifts or money is moved from the accounts you know about and seemingly disappears (overseas accounts are a popular destination).

4  Loaning or giving money to family and friends

A debt you did not know about to a family member suddenly gets paid off.  Unexpected cash gifts to family or friends. Both are signs that money is been funnelled off before a divorce.

5  A sudden “drop” in income

The lifestyle previously enjoyed by your family suddenly becomes unaffordable.  Your spouse has gone from being well-off to near insolvent and unable to pay for anything. Coincidence, or a sure sign of income deferral and divorce planning.

Funds for your spouse’s lifestyle continue to be available but funds for your lifestyle are dramatically reduced to minimise your future “income needs”.

6  A “reduction” in the value of the business/ changes in business structure

If your spouse has their own business they may seek to manipulate (understate) the value of the business and the income that flows from it in an attempt to reduce the final divorce settlement.

Take the case of Alison Sharland who received a £10 million settlement in 2012 believing it represented half of her husband’s wealth. However, it later transpired he had lied about the company’s value which the media valued at about £600m, not the divorce value of £47m and his undisclosed plans to float it on the stock market.

The above considerations may apply to a period many months, or even years, before the date you identified the marriage as being in difficulty.  The finances of divorce may be planned years in advance in much the same way as retirement planning.

Failing to disclose or wilfully understating the values of assets in a divorce case is fraud. Take the case of Young v Young, where the husband Scot became one of the first men to be jailed in Britain for failing to reveal details of the assets in a divorce case.  Although there can be redress after the settlement it is difficult to prove and costly to pursue.  Far better to get matters sorted fairly the first time around.

If you believe that your partner is hiding, or misstating the values of, assets or income to you or has lied about their assets in the divorce court proceedings, then you need to get specialist legal advice.

Our combination of divorce lawyers and specialist in-house forensic accountants will ensure you get all the right information and quickly.

“@context”: “”,
“@type”: “FAQPage”,
“mainEntity”: {
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “Whar are the six red flags of fraud and asset hiding?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “1  Changes to online accounts and passwords
2  Transfers of property or shares to children/ family members
3  Unusual cash withdrawals and spending behaviours
4  Loaning or giving money to family and friends
5  A sudden “drop” in income
6  A “reduction” in the value of the business/ changes in business structure”

Nick formally headed up Stowe Family Law’s in-house forensic accountancy department, now running his own specialist firm. He is a chartered accountant of 30+ years’ standing.

Contact us

As the UK's largest family law firm we understand that every case is personal.


  1. Rebekah says:

    My ex de facto partner has taken my business property and assets of our asset pool prior to settlement and closed the business ceasing my income. He has transferred all the assets to his fathers name without my consent or agreement. He has said we owe his father loans of 115k which are news to me, the loan documents are hand written on A4 paper and signed only by my ex and his father, they are using these loans as a reason as to why they transferred the assets to his father. I had no idea of said loans before disclosure. I dispute the loans. They have then filed trial affidavits and the father has said he intended to hire the business assets back to my ex and his new partner to re-establish the business after settlement as they expected to be awarded the business due to the loans mentioned above. They have valued the business at nil for settlement purposes, yet 1.1/2 years ago my ex closed the business without my consent or agreement and ceased my income. I want the business back to get my financial matters back in order. I have the children since separation and have paid the joint mortgage since separation for 4 of 5 years of the mortgage being established. The settlement has now been put to trial. I have requested costs in my minute of orders is this likely to be awarded? Does my claim to the business being returned to me sound reasonable due to the actions of my ex? I have also expressed my experience of abandonment and desertion due to the financial misconduct as a result of my ex’s unwillingness to communicate re the business prior and post to his ceasing it and closing it down. The goodwill has been lost entirely at separation it was valued at 890,000. Will this be added back?
    And as the father has made himself a third party by transferring the assets to him unreasonably and without agreement.
    1: is he by default now considered a third party to the case by the magistrate?
    2; can he the father or my ex be held liable to pay for his son any payment that may be awarded to me for loss of income and/or goodwill and devaluation of the business?

  2. Laura McHattie says:

    My mother is getting divorced and her ex husband has got his father to write to her solicitor to advise he helped pay toward the purchase of the family home, which he did not. We have been advised when requesting proofs that banks can only provide this going back 8 years and no further so no proofs are apparently available. Can this constitute as fraudulent actions from her ex?

Leave a comment

Help & advice categories


Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up for advice on divorce and relationships from our lawyers, divorce coaches and relationship experts.

What type of information are you looking for?

Privacy Policy