Labour Party promises free childcare

Family Law|News|September 23rd 2013

The Labour Party has promised working parents of three and four year-olds an extra ten hours’ free childcare per week if they win the next election in 2015.

Speaking at the party’s annual conference, Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls said such parents would be entitled to 25 hours free childcare per week, instead of the 15 they currently receive, provided all parents in the household worked.

Funding for the extra ten hours would come from a sharp increase in the bank levy (an annual tax on the debts held by banks), he declared.

Mr Balls claimed parents now spent £1,500 a year more on childcare than they had done under the last Labour government.

He told the BBC:

“Childcare is a vital part of our economic infrastructure that, alongside family support and flexible working, should give parents the choice to stay at home with their children when they are very small and to balance work and family as they grow older. But for many families, high childcare costs mean that it doesn’t even add up to go to work. So to make work pay for families, we must act.”

The measure would mean parents would be able to work part for the first time “without having to worry about the cost of childcare”, he claimed.

The party also plans to legislate to make every primary school stay open from 8am to 6pm, although nearby schools will be able to band together to cover the required hours. Labour has dubbed the measure, designed to cater to working parents, “wraparound childcare”.

Schools will be expected to fund any extra hours required from their existing budgets.

Author: Stowe Family Law

Comments(4)

  1. Tulsa Divorce Lawyer Matt Ingham says:

    Me personally, I like this promise made by the Labour Party however I question whether implementing it will be practical.

  2. Luke says:

    Funding for the extra ten hours would come from a sharp increase in the bank levy (an annual tax on the debts held by banks), he declared.
    =============================

    Those costs will be passed on by the banks to their customers in lending rate hikes – there is no such thing as a ‘free lunch’.

    This in reality is just electioneering, they had ten years to do this the last time they were in office – personally my view is that it is best to bring up one’s own kids, and if a person insists on not doing that and doesn’t earn enough to make it pay having hired a child minder then the rest of the population should not have to subsidise them to do so – there are enough subsidies as it is.

  3. Yvie says:

    I agree Luke, though two incomes are often a necessity in many homes. My feeling is that if a mother wants to work she should either pay for her children’s care herself or enlist the help of willing family members. Another point about more and more women getting back into the market place, is that is reduces job opportunities for fathers – again dads seem to be relegated to the back burner.

  4. Bill says:

    I agree Luke. Labour is the worst for trying to social engineer everything. The Conservatives are just evil all round.

Leave a Reply

Close

Newsletter Sign Up

For all the latest news from Stowe Family law
please sign up for instant access today.

Privacy Policy