Christian weddings should lose legal status, minister suggests

Family Law|News | 10 Mar 2014 3

Traditional Christian wedding ceremonies should lose their legal status, Justice Minister Simon Hughes has suggested.

Under the proposals, couples wishing to marry in a religious ceremony would have to attend a separate secular ceremony beforehand for the marriage to be legally valid.

The Liberal Democrat MP told the party’s spring conference:

“We should do what the Belgians do and the French do. It can be done even in the same building, on the same day, but you would have a ceremony by which the state recognises the marriage, the wedding, and then the faith community has the ceremony which gives that the authority”.

He hoped, the Telegraph reports, that the idea would not “trespass on people’s faith beliefs.”

Current marriage laws were in a “terrible muddle”, he claimed, following a recent ruling by the Supreme Court in which the Church of Scientology won the right to hold wedding ceremonies in its own venues.

The legal definition of religion should not, said the ruling, “be confined to religions which recognise a supreme deity. First and foremost, to do so would be a form of religious discrimination unacceptable in today’s society.”

The Law Commission now plans to review marriage law.

The blog team at Stowe is a group of writers who share their advice on the wellbeing and emotional aspects of divorce or separation from personal experience. Guest contributors also regularly contribute to share their knowledge.

Share This Post...

Get in touch

    Request Free Call Back

    We remain open for business during the COVID-19 outbreak. Submit your details below, and we’ll arrange a free, no-obligation call back at a time to suit you. To ensure we are the right fit, we need to make you aware that we cannot offer Legal aid.


    1. Luke says:

      Another idiotic idea from the Liberal Democrats – and I’m not a christian.

    2. Stitchedup says:

      Sites have to be licensed for weddings by the local authority/registrar, so the state has already recognised the wedding by licensing the site and registering the wedding. Why make it more difficult???? I could be wrong, but it’s no different if you’re Muslim, Christian, Jew etc, etc. It’s a level playing field isn’t it????

    3. Andrew says:

      Simon Hughes is right. And that’s not something I often say.

      Civil marriage first, and then any religious ceremony you like, on production of the wedding certificate. And prosecute anyone who celebrates a religious “marriage” without sight of the certificate: section 75 of the Marriage Act 1949 from memory.

    Leave a Reply


    Newsletter Sign Up

    For all the latest news from Stowe Family law
    please sign up for instant access today.

      Privacy Policy