Divorcee complains she has not received payout

Divorce | 11 Aug 2016 2

Recent Posts

The High Court has declined to issue an enforcement order against the estate of a Saudi billionaire after his ex-wife did not receive a multi-million pound settlement by the due deadline.

Former model Christina Estrada was married to Sheikh Walid Juffali for 12 years until he divorced her under Islamic law, following a polygamous second marriage. During the subsequent contentious court proceedings, in order to avoid conceding English jurisdiction, a move which could have left Estrada stranded, the Sheikh claimed diplomatic immunity but this argument was rejected by Mr Justice Hayden as “spurious”. An appeal heard before the Master of the Rolls confirmed that for the purposes of this divorce he was regarded as habitually resident in England and therefore was unaffected by his claimed immunity.

As the Sheikh (who was only in his 60s) lay dying of cancer at a clinic in Geneva, Christina Estrada’s claims proceeded before the High Court. Under Part III of the Family and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1984, which deals with overseas divorce, she was subsequently awarded a settlement of over £53 million, one of the largest ever granted by an English court. It was made in recognition of the “exorbitant standard of living” she had enjoyed prior to the divorce. She had originally sought more than £200 million.

The deadline for payment set at 4pm on July 29. But Dr Juffali died the week before.

Estrada’s lawyers have now informed High Court judge Mrs Justice Roberts that no payment of any kind has been received. But the Judge said she was still confident the estate of Mr Juffali would settle and pay in due course.

“I continue to stress that Dr Juffali engaged with this process though out his life time and following his death, the legal representative likely to be instructed for his estate has also engaged to the extent they have sent the court an extremely courteous letter. I hope we will get this sorted out without the need for further litigation.”

If no payment has been made by October, she continued, a further hearing will be held to decide whether or not to issue an enforcement order.

Dr Juffali’s estate is now controlled by his children, including his daughter with Estrada herself, prompting speculation that the 54 year-old might have to sue her if payment is not forthcoming.

A spokesman for Estrada, who now lives in Windsor, said she remained optimistic.

“Mrs Justice Roberts said she hoped and expected that this would be quickly resolved and we concur with this view.”

The blog team at Stowe is a group of writers who share their advice on the wellbeing and emotional aspects of divorce or separation from personal experience. Guest contributors also regularly contribute to share their knowledge.

Share This Post...

Get in touch

    Request Free Call Back

    We remain open for business during the COVID-19 outbreak. Submit your details below, and we’ll arrange a free, no-obligation call back at a time to suit you. To ensure we are the right fit, we need to make you aware that we cannot offer Legal aid.


    1. Andrew says:

      Am I missing something here?
      The ex-wife is now a judgment creditor in the sum of £53m but the judgment debtor is dead, and the debt is due from the estate. The claim is for payment in due course of administration, which will be due one year (the executor’s year) after the grant of probate of letters of administration in England; if nobody else applies for a grant the ex-wife can do so as a creditor.
      If the legal representative, whoever s/he is, is in a position to pay sooner than that and chooses tom do so, well and good, but I cannot see what sort of “enforcement order” can be made at this stage.
      Incidentally (1): she claimed £200m and got £53m. Could there be a better example of a case in which Calderbank would impose a sense of realism on both parties?
      Incidentally (2): if the claim for diplomatic immunity had been found to be well-founded I don’t think this lady would have been left penniless. And if she would have been, just too bad; that is the effect of a (well-founded) claim for immunity; if well-founded it leaves the court with no discretion.

    2. FAISAL ZABIR says:

      Serves every woman seeking divorce in England right. Her settlement died wth the Prince. She is not entitled to claim from the dead. Justice Roberts is living in a fool’s paradise. Well done Arab Prince

    Leave a Reply


    Newsletter Sign Up

    For all the latest news from Stowe Family law
    please sign up for instant access today.

      Privacy Policy